AG/SAG Mill (Variable Rates): Difference between revisions
imported>Scott.Munro m (→SysCAD) |
imported>Scott.Munro m (→Model theory) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Model theory == | == Model theory == | ||
{{ | [[File:AGSAGVariableRates7.png|thumb|450px|Figure 1. Schematic diagram of internal AG/SAG mill processes (after Napier-Munn et al., 1996).{{Napier-Munn et al. (1996)}}]] | ||
[[File:AGSAGVariableRates8.png|thumb|450px|Figure 3. Variable Rates AG/SAG mill model iterative calculation sequence (after Napier-Munn et al., 1996).{{Napier-Munn et al. (1996)}}]] | |||
The schematic diagram in Figure 1 illustrates the primary processes of ''feed'', ''breakage'', ''classification'' and ''discharge'' occurring within AG/SAG mills. | |||
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model ties these processes together through the ''perfect mixing model'', which is based on a population balance of particles entering the mill, breaking into smaller sizes, and discharging as product. For a mill operating in steady-state, the diagram in Figure 2 below represents the balance for a given size fraction: | |||
::::{| | |||
| style="padding: 10px"|<gallery mode="nolines" widths=950px heights=36px> | |||
File:BallMillPerfectMixing1.png|Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the steady-state population balance adopted by the Variable Rates AG/SAG model. | |||
</gallery> | |||
|} | |||
The steady-state population balance is formulated mathematically as:{{Valery_and_Morrell_(1995)}} | |||
:<math>f_i + \sum_{j=1}^{i-1}A_{ij}R_js_j - (R_is_i-A_{ii}R_is_i) - p_i = 0</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>i</math> is the index of the size interval, <math>i = \{1,2,\dots,n\}</math>, <math>n</math> is the number of size intervals | |||
* <math>f_i</math> is the volumetric flow rate of solids of size interval <math>i</math> in the mill feed (m<sup>3</sup>/h) | |||
* <math>p_i</math> is the volumetric flow rate of solids of size interval <math>i</math> in the mill product (m<sup>3</sup>/h) | |||
* <math>s_i</math> is the volume of solids of size interval <math>i</math> in the mill load (m<sup>3</sup>) | |||
* <math>R_i</math> is the breakage rate of solids of size interval <math>i</math> in the mill load (h<sup>-1</sup>) | |||
* <math>A_{ij}</math> is the appearance function, the distribution of particle volume arising from the breakage of a parent particle in size interval <math>j</math> into progeny of size interval <math>i</math> (frac) | |||
As the mill is perfectly mixed, the product is related to the mill contents and discharge rate as: | |||
:<math>p_i=D_is_i</math> | |||
where <math>D_i</math> is the rate of discharge of solids in size interval <math>i</math> from the mill (h<sup>-1</sup>). | |||
Therefore, the mill load at steady-state can be computed from: | |||
:<math>s_i= \dfrac{f_i + \sum\limits_{j=1}^{i-1}{A_{ij} R_j s_j}}{D_i + R_i - A_{ii} R_i}</math> | |||
and the product <math>p_i</math> subsequently determined. | |||
Liquids retained in the mill at steady-state are similarly determined from: | |||
:<math>f_{\rm L} - D_{\rm L} s_{\rm L} = 0</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>s_{\rm L}</math> is the load volume of liquids in the mill (m<sup>3</sup>) | |||
* <math>f_{\rm L}</math> is the volumetric feed rate of liquids into the mill (m<sup>3</sup>/h) | |||
* <math>D_{\rm L}</math> is the discharge rate of liquids from the mill, normally assumed to equal <math>D_n</math> (h<sup>-1</sup>). | |||
=== Calculation sequence === | |||
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model uses a range of sub-models to quantify the breakage rate (<math>R</math>), appearance function (<math>A</math>), and discharge function (<math>D</math>) terms of the perfect mixing model, and hence compute the mill load (<math>s</math>) and product (<math>p</math>) at steady-state. | |||
These sub-models are strongly interactive, and an iterative calculation sequence is necessary to numerically solve the steady-state population balance. The required calculation sequence is presented in Figure 3. | |||
The sub-models are described in further detail below. | |||
=== Breakage rates === | |||
[[File:AGSAGVariableRates12.png|thumb|450px|Figure 4. Breakage rate distribution characterised by cubic spline interpolation.]] | |||
The breakage rate at each size interval, <math>R_i</math> (h<sup>-1</sup>), is generated by [[Interpolation|cubic spline interpolation]] between five breakage rate knots (<math>R1 - R5</math>) at the 0.25, 4, 16, 44 and 128 mm particle size positions.{{Leung et al. (1987)}} | |||
Morrell and Morrison (1996) described the following set of empirical equations which relate the breakage rate knots <math>R1 - R5</math> to mill operating conditions:{{Morrell and Morrison (1996)}} | |||
:<math> | |||
\begin{array}{l} | |||
\ln(R1) = \mathit{RConst}_1 + \dfrac{k_{11} + k_{12} \ln (R2) - k_{13} \ln (R3) + J_{\rm B} (k_{14} - k_{15} F_{80}) - D_{\rm B}}{S_{\rm b}}\\ | |||
\ln(R2) = \mathit{RConst}_2 + k_{21}+ k_{22}\ln(R3) - k_{23} \ln(R4) - k_{24} F_{80}\\ | |||
\ln(R3) = \mathit{RConst}_3 + S_{\rm a} + \dfrac{k_{31} + k_{32} \ln(R4) - k_{33} R_{\rm r}}{S_{\rm b}}\\ | |||
\ln(R4) = \mathit{RConst}_4 + S_{\rm b} (k_{41} + k_{42} \ln(R5) + J_{\rm B} (k_{43} - k_{44} F_{80}))\\ | |||
\ln(R5) = \mathit{RConst}_5 + S_{\rm a} + S_{\rm b} \left (k_{51} + k_{52} F_{80} + J_{\rm B} (k_{53} - k_{54} F_{80}) - 3.0 D_{\rm B} \right )\\ | |||
\end{array} | |||
</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>\mathit{RConst}_1 - \mathit{RConst}_5</math> are user-defined constants which can be used to adjust modelled breakage rates to observed values | |||
* <math>J_{\rm B}</math> is the fraction of total mill volume occupied by balls and associated voids (% v/v) | |||
* <math>F_{80}</math> is the 80% passing size of new feed (mm) | |||
* <math>k_{ij}</math> are the regression coefficients specified in Table 1. | |||
:{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ Table 1. Breakage rate regression coefficients (after Morrell and Morrison, 1996).{{Morrell and Morrison (1996)}} | |||
|- | |||
! <math>j</math> !! <math>k_{1j}</math> !! <math>k_{2j}</math> !! <math>k_{3j}</math> !! <math>k_{4j}</math> !! <math>k_{5j}</math> | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || 2.504|| 4.682|| 3.141|| 1.057|| 1.894 | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || 0.397|| 0.468|| 0.402|| 0.333|| 0.014 | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || 0.597|| 0.327|| 4.632 || 0.171|| 0.473 | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || 0.192|| 0.0085|| -|| 0.0014|| 0.002 | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || 0.002 || - || -|| -|| - | |||
|} | |||
The mill rotational speed scaling factor, <math>S_{\rm a}</math>, is computed from the mill rotational speed (rpm) as: | |||
:<math>S_{\rm a} = \ln \left ( \dfrac{\text{Mill speed (rpm)}}{23.6} \right )</math> | |||
Similarly, the mill fraction critical speed scaling factor, <math>S_{\rm b}</math>, is computed from the [[Tumbling Mill (Speed)|mill fraction critical speed]], <math>\phi</math> (frac), as: | |||
:<math>S_{\rm b} = \dfrac{\phi}{0.75}</math> | |||
The ball diameter scaling factor, <math>D_{\rm B}</math>, is computed from the ball top size, <math>d_{\rm B,Top}</math> (mm), as: | |||
:<math>D_{\rm B} = \ln \left ( \dfrac{d_{\rm B,Top}}{90} \right )</math> | |||
The recycle ratio, <math>R_{\rm r}</math>, is the ratio of the mass flowrate of recycled -20+4 mm material to the total mass flowrate of all new feed plus recycled -20+4 mm material, i.e. | |||
:<math>R_{\rm r} = \dfrac{Q_{\rm M,R} (P_{20\text{mm,R}} - P_{4\text{mm,R}})}{Q_{\rm M,F} + Q_{\rm M,R}(P_{20\text{mm,R}} - P_{4\text{mm,R}})}</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>Q_{\rm M,F}</math> is new feed mass flow rate (t/h) | |||
* <math>Q_{\rm M,R}</math> is recycle feed mass flow rate (t/h) | |||
* <math>P_{20\text{mm,R}}</math> and <math>P_{4\text{mm,R}}</math> are the fraction of recycle feed passing 20 mm and 4 mm size, respectively (frac) | |||
The recycle ratio, <math>R_{\rm r}</math>, is only applicable when the coarse recycled feed component consists of mill pebbles (scats) which have not undergone an intervening breakage step such as pebble crushing. | |||
Figure 4 presents an example breakage rate distribution constructed from the five breakage rate knots and a continuous cubic spline. | |||
=== Discharge rates === | |||
The discharge rates (<math>D</math>) are related to the hold-up of slurry in the mill and particle classification at the discharge grates. | |||
==== Slurry hold-up ==== | |||
[[File:AGSAGVariableRates9.png|thumb|450px|Figure 5. Principal dimensions of an AG/SAG mill.]] | |||
The volumetric flow rate of slurry discharged from a grated mill depends on the level of slurry hold-up within the mill, in a manner analogous to flow from the bottom of a filled tank. | |||
In a steady-state model, the discharge flow rate is equal to the feed flow rate by definition. The following empirical relationship is used to estimate slurry hold-up in a grated mill for a given discharge flow rate:{{Napier-Munn et al. (1996)}} | |||
:<math>L_{\rm V} = m_1 \left ( \dfrac{F}{V} \right )^{m_2}</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>L_{\rm V}</math> is the fraction of mill volume occupied by below grate size solids and water (v/v) | |||
* <math>F</math> is the volumetric flow rate of slurry discharged from the mill (m<sup>3</sup>/min) | |||
* <math>m_1</math> is a constant related to grate design and mill speed | |||
* <math>m_2</math> is a constant assumed to take the value of 0.5.{{Kojovic et al. (2012)}} | |||
The volume of the mill, <math>V</math>, is calculated as the sum of a cylinder and two right circular frustums:{{Gupta and Yan (2016)}} | |||
:<math>V = \pi {R_{\rm m}}^2L + 2 \cdot \bigg[ \dfrac{\pi}{3} (R_{\rm m} - R_{\rm t}) \cdot \tan \alpha_{\rm c} \cdot \left ( {R_{\rm m}}^{2} + R_{\rm m} R_{\rm t} + {R_{\rm t}}^{2} \right) \bigg]</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>R_{\rm m}</math> is the radius of the mill inside the liners (m), equal to half of the diameter of the mill inside the liners, <math>D</math> (m) | |||
* <math>R_{\rm t}</math> is the radius of the discharge trunnion (m), equal to half of the diameter of the discharge trunnion, <math>D_{\rm t}</math> (m) | |||
* <math>L</math> is the length of the cylindrical (belly) section of the mill (m) | |||
* <math>\alpha_{\rm c}</math> is the cone angle, measured as the angular displacement of the cone surface from the vertical direction (rad) | |||
The principal dimensions of an AG/SAG mill required to compute mill volume and other properties are shown in Figure 5. | |||
Morrell and Stephenson (1996) related discharge flow rate to slurry hold-up, grate design and mill speed with the following semi-empirical relation:{{Morrell and Stephenson (1996)}} | |||
:<math>Q_{\rm m} = k_{\rm m} {J_{\rm pm}}^2 \gamma^{2.5} A \phi^{-1.34} D^{0.5}</math> | |||
where | |||
* <math>Q_{\rm m}</math> is the volumetric discharge rate of slurry through the grinding media zone (m<sup>3</sup>/h) | |||
* <math>k_{\rm m}</math> is the slurry discharge coefficient for the grinding media zone | |||
* <math>J_{\rm pm}</math> is the net fractional slurry hold-up in the grinding media interstices (v/v) | |||
* <math>A</math> is the total open area of grate apertures (m<sup>2</sup>) | |||
* <math>\phi</math> is the fraction critical speed of the mill (frac) | |||
* <math>D</math> is the mill diameter (m) | |||
and the mean radial position of the grate apertures, <math>\gamma</math> (m/m), is defined as: | |||
:<math>\gamma = \frac{\sum{r_ia_i}}{r_{\rm m} \sum{a_i}}</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>a_i</math> is the open area of all holes (m<sup>2</sup>) at radial position <math>r_i</math> (m) | |||
* <math>r_{\rm m}</math> is the radius of the mill inside the liners (m) | |||
In addition to fine slurry, particles up to the the grate aperture size will also discharge from the mill. To estimate total discharge flow rate, <math>Q</math> (m<sup>3</sup>/h), Morrell and Stephenson (1996) suggest the following correction:{{Morrell and Stephenson (1996)}} | |||
:<math>Q = k_{\rm g} Q_{\rm m}</math> | |||
where <math>k_{\rm g}</math> is a factor to account for coarse material, and taking the values shown in Table 2. | |||
:{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ Table 2. Applied values for <math>k_{\rm g}</math>.{{Morrell and Stephenson (1996)}} | |||
|- | |||
! Aperture !! <math>k_{\rm g}</math> | |||
|- | |||
| Grates only; <19mm || 1.07 | |||
|- | |||
| Grates only; 19mm - 28mm|| 1.125 | |||
|- | |||
| Grates >38mm or pebble ports || 1.2 | |||
|} | |||
The value of <math>m_1</math> for a given grate design and mill can be determined by observing that <math>L_{\rm V} = J_{\rm pm}</math> and <math>F = Q \big / 60</math> in the above equations, i.e.:{{Kojovic et al. (2012)}} | |||
:<math>m_1 \left ( \dfrac{Q}{60V} \right )^{0.5} = {k_{\rm g}}^{-0.5} {k_{\rm m}}^{-0.5} Q^{0.5} \gamma^{-1.25} A^{-0.5} \phi^{0.67} D^{-0.25}</math> | |||
The mill volume, <math>V</math>, can expressed as the product of the mill cross sectional area and an ''equivalent grinding length'', <math>L_{\rm eq}</math> (m), i.e.: | |||
:<math>V = \pi \left ( \dfrac{D}{2} \right )^2 L_{\rm eq} \implies L_{\rm eq} = \dfrac{V}{\pi \left ( \frac{D}{2} \right )^2}</math> | |||
Furthermore, the total open area of the grates, <math>A</math> (m<sup>2</sup>), can be replaced with an expression combining the grate ''open area fraction'', <math>A_{\rm OF}</math> (m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>), and mill cross-sectional area: | |||
:<math>A = \pi \left ( \dfrac{D}{2} \right )^2 A_{\rm OF}</math> | |||
Replacing the <math>V</math> and <math>A</math> terms in the <math>m_1</math> equation above yields: | |||
:<math>m_1 = \sqrt{60} \cdot ({k_{\rm g}} {k_{\rm m}})^{-0.5} \gamma^{-1.25} {A_{\rm OF}}^{-0.5} \phi^{0.67} D^{-0.25} {L_{\rm eq}}^{0.5}</math> | |||
Thus, slurry hold-up, <math>L_{\rm V}</math>, can be computed for a given feed/discharge flow rate, grate design and mill. | |||
==== Classification and discharge ==== | |||
[[File:AGSAGVariableRates10.png|thumb|450px|Figure 6. Classification function, <math>C_i</math>, with pebble port open are fraction, <math>f_p</math>, specified.]] | |||
[[File:AGSAGVariableRates11.png|thumb|450px|Figure 7. Classification function, <math>C_i</math>, where pebble port open are fraction, <math>f_p</math>, is zero, i.e grates only.]] | |||
The discharge rate of solids from the grate of a perfectly mixed mill is:{{Kojovic et al. (2012)}} | |||
:<math>p_i = D_i.s_i</math> | |||
where: | |||
:<math>D_i = d_{\rm max}.C_i</math> | |||
:<math> C_i = | |||
\begin{cases} | |||
1 & \bar d_i \leq x_{\rm m}\\ | |||
\left ( 1 - \dfrac{\ln \bar d_i -\ln x_{\rm m}}{\ln x_{\rm g} - \ln x_{\rm m} } \right )(1 - f_{\rm p}) + f_{\rm p} & x_{\rm m}<\bar d_i\leq x_{\rm g}\\ | |||
\left ( 1 - \dfrac{\ln \bar d_i -\ln x_{\rm g}}{\ln x_{\rm p} - \ln x_{\rm g} } \right ) .f_{\rm p} & x_{\rm g}<\bar d_i\leq x_{\rm p}\\ | |||
0 & \bar d_i>x_{\rm p}\\ | |||
\end{cases} | |||
</math> | |||
and: | |||
* <math>d_{\rm max}</math> is the fraction of load presented to the mill discharge per unit of time (h<sup>-1</sup>) | |||
* <math>C_{i}</math> is the classification function, the fraction of particles of size <math>i</math> reporting to the mill product (frac) | |||
* <math>\bar d_i</math> is the [[Conversions|geometric mean size]] of particles in size interval <math>i</math> (mm) | |||
* <math>x_{\rm m}</math> is the particle size below which all mass in the size interval reports to mill product (mm), i.e. like water | |||
* <math>x_{\rm g}</math> is the grate aperture size (mm) | |||
* <math>x_{\rm p}</math> is the pebble port size (mm) | |||
* <math>f_{\rm p}</math> is the fraction of open area occupied by pebble ports (m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>) | |||
Figure 6 shows an example classification function with pebble ports included, whilst Figure 7 shows the same function with a grate-only mill. | |||
The value of <math>d_{\rm max}</math> is adjusted during the calculation sequence (Figure 3) to ensure the fraction of solids less than <math>x_{\rm g}</math> plus water retained in the mill load computed by the perfect mixing population balance matches the slurry hold-up determined by the [[AG/SAG Mill (Variable Rates)#Slurry_flow|slurry flow]] calculations. | |||
=== Appearance function === | |||
The appearance function, <math>A</math>, is defined as the mass-by-size distribution of progeny particles resulting from the breakage of parent particles. | |||
Two types of particle breakage are theorised to occur occur within AG/SAG mills: | |||
# ''High energy'' breakage from the impact of cataracting balls and large rocks at the toe of the charge, and | |||
# ''Low energy'' breakage from the abrasion and attrition of particles within the charge bed. | |||
The appearance function for an AG/SAG mill is constructed from the combination of appearance functions for the high energy, <math>A_{\rm HE}</math>, and low energy, <math>A_{\rm LE}</math>, breakage regimes. | |||
An appearance function is a lower triangular matrix as all broken particles are, by definition, smaller than their parent particle. | |||
==== High energy ==== | |||
Leung et al. (1987) related the amount of energy available for high energy impact breakage in a mill to the mean size of the top 20% of the charge, <math>S_{20}</math> (mm). The <math>S_{20}</math> is defined as:{{Leung et al. (1987)}} | |||
:<math>S_{20} = \left (P_{100} \cdot P_{98} \cdot P_{96} \dots P_{80} \right )^{\frac{1}{11}} </math> | |||
where <math>P_{x}</math> is the size passing fraction <math>x</math> (mm) of the charge, which includes ore and balls (if present). | |||
A particle of representative size <math>S_{20}</math> falling through the full height of the mill converts the following potential energy into impact (kinetic) energy: | |||
:<math>E_q = \dfrac{\frac{4}{3} \pi \left ( \dfrac{S_{20}}{2000} \right )^3 \rho_{\rm S} g D}{3600}</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>E_q</math> is the energy level in the mill applied to particles in size fraction <math>q</math> (kWh) | |||
* <math>q</math> is defined as the index of the size interval containing the largest particle in the feed, <math>1 \leq q \leq n</math> | |||
* <math>\rho_{\rm S}</math> is the density of solids in the mill (t/m<sup>3</sup>) | |||
* <math>g</math> is acceleration due to gravity (m/s<sup>2</sup>) | |||
* <math>D</math> is the mil diameter (m) | |||
and the above equation has been corrected from Leung et al. (1987) for particle radius and measurement units. | |||
The energy level, <math>E_q</math>, is converted to the specific comminution energy applied to a particle in size fraction <math>q</math>, <math>(E_{\rm cs})_q</math> (kWh/t), by:{{Bueno et al. (2013)}} | |||
:<math>(E_{\rm cs})_q = \dfrac{E_p}{\frac{4}{3} \pi \left ( \dfrac{\bar d_q}{2000} \right )^3 \rho_{\rm S}}</math> | |||
where <math>\bar d_q</math> is the [[Conversions#Geometric_mean_size|geometric mean size]] (mm) of a particle in size interval <math>q</math>, and the equation is again corrected for radius and units. | |||
The specific comminution energy <math>(E_{\rm cs})_q</math> is scaled to smaller size fractions by:{{Bueno et al. (2013)}} | |||
:<math>{(E_{\rm cs})_i} = | |||
\begin{cases} | |||
0 & i < q\\ | |||
\dfrac{(E_{\rm cs})_q}{ \left ( \dfrac{\bar d_i}{\bar d_q} \right )^{1.5} } & q \leq i \leq n\\ | |||
\end{cases} | |||
</math> | |||
To compute the high energy appearance function, the fraction of particles passing one-tenth of the initial mean particle, the <math>t_{\rm 10}</math> (frac), is determined for the specific comminution energy applied at each size:{{Leung et al. (1987)}} | |||
:<math>(t_{10})_i = A(1-{\rm e}^{-b (E_{\rm cs})_i})</math> | |||
where <math>A</math> and <math>b</math> are ore-specific hardness parameters obtained from a drop weight test.{{Napier-Munn et al. (1996)}} | |||
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model uses the standard matrix of cumulative fraction passing data points in Table 3 to describe the products of a high breakage event for any ore type.{{Napier-Munn et al. (1996)}} | |||
Each element of the matrix, <math>t_{x,y}</math>, represents the percentage fraction of progeny particles passing one-<math>y</math>th of the original parent particle geometric mean size, when <math>x</math>% of the products pass one-tenth of the original product size (i.e. the <math>t_{10}</math>). | |||
:{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ Table 3. Standard appearance function data used in the Variable Rates AG/SAG model.{{Napier-Munn et al. (1996)}} | |||
! | |||
!<math>t_{75}(\%)</math> | |||
!<math>t_{50}(\%)</math> | |||
!<math>t_{25}(\%)</math> | |||
!<math>t_{4}(\%)</math> | |||
!<math>t_{2}(\%)</math> | |||
|- | |||
|<math>t_{10}=10\%</math> | |||
|2.33 | |||
|3.06 | |||
|4.98 | |||
|23.33 | |||
|50.53 | |||
|- | |||
|<math>t_{10}=20\%</math> | |||
|6.89 | |||
|9.41 | |||
|15.62 | |||
|61.58 | |||
|92.49 | |||
|- | |||
|<math>t_{10}=50\%</math> | |||
|10.32 | |||
|14.71 | |||
|25.88 | |||
|82.86 | |||
|96.47 | |||
|} | |||
This matrix allows a complete breakage product size distribution for any parent size and mesh series to be reconstructed from the <math>t_{10}</math> via the following steps: | |||
# A [[Interpolation#Cubic_spline_interpolation|cubic spline]] is used to interpolate <math>t_{75}</math> - <math>t_2</math> values for the <math>(t_{\rm 10})_i</math> at each particle size fraction's specific comminution energy. | |||
# A secondary cubic spline interpolation is used to produce a distribution across the full mesh size interval range for each parent particle size. | |||
The [[Crusher (Whiten)|Whiten crusher]] model also applies a similar appearance function spline interpolation procedure. | |||
==== Ball load ==== | |||
Semi-Autogenous (SAG) mills add steel ball grinding media to the ore charge to increase size reduction. | |||
The mass of balls in a mill, <math>M_{\rm B}</math> (t), is related to the volume occupied by the balls by:{{Morrell (1992)}} | |||
:<math>M_{\rm B} = J_{\rm B} (1 - \varepsilon) V \rho_{\rm B}</math> | |||
where | |||
* <math>J_{\rm B}</math> is the fraction of mill volume occupied by balls and the void space between them, when the mill is at rest (v/v) | |||
* <math>\varepsilon</math> is the void fraction, taken as 0.4 (v/v) | |||
The calculation of specific comminution energy for the [[AG/SAG Mill (Variable Rates)#High_energy|high energy appearance function]] above uses the average size of the top 20% of the charge, the <math>S_{20}</math>. A charge that includes balls must incorporate the media load into the calculation of the <math>S_{20}</math>. This is achieved by considering the ball load as if each ball were an ore particle with the same mass, but a larger diameter to compensate for the density difference between steel and rock, i.e.:{{Leung et al. (1987)}} | |||
:<math> | |||
m_{\rm B} = v_{\rm B} \rho_{\rm B} = \frac{4}{3} \pi \left ( \frac{d_{\rm B}}{2} \right )^3 \rho_{\rm B}, \quad | |||
v_{\rm S} = \frac{4}{3} \pi \left ( \frac{d_{\rm S}}{2} \right )^3 = \frac{m_{\rm B}}{\rho_{\rm S}} = \frac{\frac{4}{3} \pi \left ( \frac{d_{\rm B}}{2} \right )^3 \rho_{\rm B}}{\rho_{\rm S}} \quad | |||
\implies d_{\rm S} = \left ( \frac{{{d_{\rm B}}^3 \rho_{\rm B}}}{\rho_{\rm S}} \right )^{\frac{1}{3}} | |||
</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>m_{\rm B}</math> and <math>v_{\rm B}</math> are the mass and volume of a ball, respectively. | |||
* <math>\rho_{\rm B}</math> is the density of a ball | |||
* <math>d_{\rm B}</math> is the diameter of a ball | |||
* <math>v_{\rm S}</math> is the volume of an ore particle | |||
* <math>\rho_{\rm S}</math> is the density of ore solids in the charge | |||
* <math>d_{\rm S}</math> is the diameter of an ore particle with equivalent mass to a ball | |||
Therefore, a weight fraction retained distribution of balls on any size interval series is incorporated into the the <math>S_{20}</math> calculation by the following steps: | |||
# Scale the ball size intervals (<math>d_{\rm B}</math>) to equivalent ore size intervals (<math>d_{\rm S}</math>) as per the equation above. | |||
# Use a [[Interpolation#Cubic_spline_interpolation|monotonic spline]] to [[Conversions#Convert_between_meshes|convert]] the ball distribution from the scaled equivalent ore size intervals (<math>d_{\rm S}</math>) to the size intervals used by the perfect mixing population balance formulation (<math>d_i</math>). | |||
# Convert the weight fraction retained ball distribution to a mass retained distribution using the ball mass, <math>M_{\rm B}</math>. | |||
# Convert the mass retained ball distribution to a volume retained distribution using the ore density, <math>\rho_{\rm S}</math>. | |||
# Combine the ball volume-by-size and ore volume-by-size in the charge (<math>s_i</math>) when computing the <math>S_{20}</math>. | |||
==== Low energy ==== | |||
The low energy appearance function is computed from the ore-specific abrasion parameter, <math>t_a</math> (%), which is obtained from the ore abrasion test described by Napier-Munn et al. (1996).{{Napier-Munn et al. (1996)}} | |||
The cumulative fraction passing distribution of progeny particles arising from the abrasion breakage of a parent particle is computed by multiplying the <math>t_a</math> for a given ore by the scaling factors indicated in Table 4.{{Leung et al. (1987)}} | |||
:{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ Table 4. Standard abrasion appearance function data.{{Leung et al. (1987)}} | |||
|- | |||
! !! Cumulative fraction passing (%) | |||
|- | |||
| <math>t_{1}</math>|| <math>100</math> | |||
|- | |||
| <math>t_{1.25}</math>|| <math>2.687 \cdot t_{\rm a}</math> | |||
|- | |||
| <math>t_{1.5}</math>|| <math>1.631 \cdot t_{\rm a}</math> | |||
|- | |||
| <math>t_{10}</math>|| <math>1.0 \cdot t_{\rm a}</math> | |||
|- | |||
| <math>t_{100}</math>|| <math>0.9372 \cdot t_{\rm a}</math> | |||
|- | |||
| <math>t_{250}</math>|| <math>0.8070 \cdot t_{\rm a}</math> | |||
|- | |||
| <math>t_{500}</math>|| <math>0.6365 \cdot t_{\rm a}</math> | |||
|} | |||
The low energy appearance function is then determined for all parent particle sizes and across the full mesh series by spline interpolation of the cumulative fraction passing values computed above. | |||
Note that a [[Interpolation#Cubic_spline_interpolation|monotonic spline]] is employed for the low energy appearance function as the sharp change in cumulative fraction passing values between the original parent size (<math>t_1</math>) and the first progeny size (<math>t_{1.25}</math>) can result in undesired oscillation and negative function values when applying a regular cubic spline. | |||
==== Combined appearance function ==== | |||
The high and low energy appearance functions are combined based on the relative proportions of <math>t_{\rm a}</math> and the <math>t_{10}</math> at each specific comminution energy:{{Leung et al. (1987)}} | |||
:<math>A = \dfrac{t_{10} . A_{\rm HE} + t_{\rm a} . A_{\rm LE}}{t_{10} + t_{\rm a}}</math> | |||
=== Mill power === | |||
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model includes an implementation of the [[Tumbling Mill (Power, Morrell Continuum)|Morrell Continuum]] tumbling mill power model. The predicted mill power draw is not utilised by the Variable Rates model formulation in any manner, and is provided for information only. | |||
==== Charge properties ==== | |||
The power draw prediction requires an estimate of <math>J_{\rm t}</math> (v/v), the fraction of mill volume occupied by the charge, which includes coarse ore, balls, slurry, and void spaces. | |||
Morrell (1992) provides relations for the mass of coarse ore, slurried ore, water and balls in a mill.{{Morrell (1992)}} Converting from mass to fraction of mill volume, these relations are: | |||
:<math>\frac{V_{\rm co}}{V} = (J_{\rm t} - J_{\rm B})(1 - \varepsilon), \quad \frac{V_{\rm so}}{V} = J_{\rm t} \varepsilon U S, \quad \frac{V_{\rm L}}{V} = J_{\rm t} \varepsilon U (1 - S), \quad \frac{V_{\rm B}}{V} = J_{\rm B} (1 - \varepsilon)</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math>V_{\rm co}</math>, <math>V_{\rm so}</math>, <math>V_{\rm L}</math>, and <math>V_{\rm B}</math> are the volumes of coarse ore, slurried ore, liquids, and balls in the mill, respectively (m<sup>3</sup>) | |||
* <math>S</math> is the volume fraction of solids in the mill discharge (v/v) | |||
* <math>U</math> is the fraction of void space between the coarse ore particles and balls that is filled with slurry (v/v) | |||
The total volume of ore in the mill, <math>V_{\rm o}</math> (m<sup>3</sup>), is computed by the perfect mixing model, i.e.: | |||
:<math>V_{\rm o} = \sum_{i=1}^n s_i</math> | |||
Subtracting the slurried ore component from the total ore volume, the coarse ore volume is: | |||
:<math>\frac{V_{\rm co}}{V} = \frac{V_{\rm o}}{V} - \frac{V_{\rm so}}{V} \implies (J_{\rm t} - J_{\rm B})(1 - \varepsilon) = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n s_i}{V} - J_{\rm t} \varepsilon U S</math> | |||
and rearranging for <math>J_{\rm t}</math> yields: | |||
:<math>J_{\rm t} = \dfrac{J_{\rm B} (\varepsilon - 1) - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n s_i}{V}}{\varepsilon (1 - U S) - 1}</math> | |||
The value of <math>U</math> in the above equation is unknown, and is itself a function of <math>J_{\rm t}</math>. To simplify the calculations, <math>J_{\rm t}</math> is estimated for a given mill load and discharge by assuming <math>U = 1</math>. | |||
Having computed an estimate for <math>J_{\rm t}</math>, the value of <math>U</math> may be approximated by: | |||
:<math>U = \dfrac{L_{\rm V}}{\varepsilon J_{\rm t}}</math> | |||
and the apparent density of the charge, <math>\rho_{\rm c}</math>, is:{{Morrell (1996a)}} | |||
:<math>\rho_{\rm c} = \frac{J_{\rm t} \rho_{\rm S} (1 - \varepsilon + \varepsilon U S) + J_{\rm B}( \rho_{\rm B} - \rho_{\rm S})(1 - \varepsilon) + J_{\rm t} \varepsilon U (1 - S)}{J_{\rm t}}, \quad U \leq 1</math> | |||
==== Power draw ==== | |||
:''Main article'': [[Tumbling Mill (Power, Morrell Continuum)]] | |||
This implementation of the Variable Rates AG/SAG model applies Morrell's (1996) tumbling mill power draw equations for a grated mill which include terms for the conical end sections of the mill.{{Morrell (1996a)}}{{Bueno et al. (2013)}} | |||
The values of <math>J_{\rm t}</math>, <math>U</math>, and <math>\rho_{\rm c}</math>, plus mill dimensions and rotational speed are inputs to the power draw estimation equations. | |||
The equations return the following charge position and power draw results: | |||
* The angular position of the charge shoulder, <math>\theta_{\rm S}</math> (rad) | |||
* The angular position of the charge toe, <math>\theta_{\rm T}</math> (rad) | |||
* The charge surface radius, <math>r_{\rm i}</math> (m) | |||
* The no-load power of the mill, <math>P_{\rm NoLoad}</math> (kW) | |||
* The net power of the mill, <math>P_{\rm Net}</math> (kW) | |||
* The gross power of the mill, <math>P_{\rm Gross}</math> (kW) | |||
The complete equations are excluded here for brevity and are available at the article link above. | |||
=== Internal mesh series === | |||
The Variable Rates AG/SAG mill model is formulated internally with a geometric progression of <math>n = 42</math> mesh sizes at <math>\sqrt{2}</math> intervals, i.e. | |||
:<math>d_i = | |||
\begin{cases} | |||
d_1 & i=1\\ | |||
\dfrac{d_1}{i\sqrt{2}} & 1 < i < n\\ | |||
0 & i = n | |||
\end{cases} | |||
</math> | |||
where <math>d_1</math> (mm) is the top size of the internal mesh series. | |||
Feed, load and product size fractions are automatically converted to and from the internal mesh series during model computation. | |||
The internal mesh series chosen can have an impact on the calculated value of <math>S_{20}</math> via the <math>P_{100}</math> parameter, which subsequently affects the computed mill load and discharge. As such, the internal mesh top size, <math>d_1</math>, is specified by the user. This ensures consistency when model parameters are transferred from once instance to another. | |||
=== Multicomponent modelling === | |||
Published formulations of the Variable Rates AG/SAG model and its predecessors only consider feeds and loads consisting of a single ore type.{{Leung et al. (1987)}}{{Kojovic et al. (2012)}}{{Bueno et al. (2013)}} | |||
In practice, mill feeds are often multicomponent, consisting of ores and minerals blended from multiple, differing sources. Recirculation of coarse, harder material for additional grinding passes adds to this complexity. | |||
This implementation of the Variable Rates AG/SAG model addresses multicomponent feeds in a simple way:{{Bueno et al. (2013)}} | |||
# Each ore type in a mill feed is assigned a separate set of density (<math>\rho_{\rm S}</math>) and hardness (<math>A</math>, <math>b</math>, <math>t_{\rm a}</math>) parameters. | |||
# Ore masses-by-size are converted to volumes-by-size via the density parameters. | |||
# The <math>S_{20}</math> parameter value is determined on a volumetric basis for the combined ore types (and balls). | |||
# The <math>(E_{\rm cs})_q</math> parameter value is determined using the overall density of all ore types in the mill load (i.e. the harmonic mean). | |||
# Different appearance functions are then applied to separate population balance computations for each ore type in the feed. | |||
This multicomponent approach allows harder and coarser ore particles to accumulate in the mill load and preferentially concentrate in coarse recycle streams, as would be expected in practice. | |||
Multiple ore types are excluded from the model formulations found in the previous sections of this article for clarity, but steps 1 - 5 above are automatically undertaken during model calculation. | |||
The multicomponent formulation reverts to the original single ore approach when only one ore type is present, or each ore type of a multicomponent feed is assigned the same values of <math>\rho_{\rm S}</math>, <math>A</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>t_{\rm a}</math>. | |||
=== Additional notes === | |||
==== Breakage rates and mill load ==== | |||
An important, and potentially overlooked, limitation of the Variable Rates AG/SAG mill model is the insensitivity of the breakage rate relationships to mill load. Mill simulations should therefore use mill loads close or equal to the load observed during model fitting, or 25% for design activities.{{Bailey et al. (2009)}} | |||
==== Slurry pool ==== | |||
Various published descriptions of the Variable Rates AG/SAG mill suggest that slurry pooling phenomena are excluded from slurry hold-up and power draw estimations.{{Morrell and Morrison (1996)}}{{Kojovic et al. (2012)}}{{Bueno et al. (2013)}} | |||
This implementation similarly excludes slurry pooling, and any model results returning values of <math>U > 1</math> should be inspected carefully. | |||
== Excel == | == Excel == | ||
Line 21: | Line 537: | ||
{{Excel (Text, Inputs)}} | {{Excel (Text, Inputs)}} | ||
:<math>Parameters= | :<math>\mathit{Parameters} = | ||
\begin{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
D\text{ (m)}\\ | D\text{ (m)}\\ | ||
Line 28: | Line 544: | ||
\alpha_{c}\text{ (deg.)}\\ | \alpha_{c}\text{ (deg.)}\\ | ||
\phi\text{ (frac)}\\ | \phi\text{ (frac)}\\ | ||
A_{\rm OF}\text{ (m}^{\text{2}}\text{)}\\ | |||
f_{\rm p}\text{ (m}^2\text{/m}^2\text{)}\\ | f_{\rm p}\text{ (m}^2\text{/m}^2\text{)}\\ | ||
x_{\rm p}\text{ (mm)}\\ | x_{\rm p}\text{ (mm)}\\ | ||
Line 37: | Line 553: | ||
J_{\rm B}\text{ (v/v)}\\ | J_{\rm B}\text{ (v/v)}\\ | ||
\rho_{\rm B}\text{ (t/m}^3\text{)}\\ | \rho_{\rm B}\text{ (t/m}^3\text{)}\\ | ||
d_{\rm B}\text{ (mm)}\\ | d_{\rm B,Top}\text{ (mm)}\\ | ||
F_{80}\text{ (mm)}\\ | |||
d_1\text{ (mm)}\\ | |||
\varepsilon\text{ (v/v)}\\ | \varepsilon\text{ (v/v)}\\ | ||
(Q_{\rm M,F})_{\rm L}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | (Q_{\rm M,F})_{\rm L}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | ||
\rho_{\rm L}\text{ (t/m}^{\text{3}}\text{)}\\ | \rho_{\rm L}\text{ (t/m}^{\text{3}}\text{)}\\ | ||
u\\ | |||
v\\ | |||
\end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | \end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | ||
Size = \begin{bmatrix} | \mathit{Size} = \begin{bmatrix} | ||
\hat{d}_{1}\text{ (mm)}\\ | |||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
\hat{d}_r\text{ (mm)}\\ | |||
\end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | \end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | ||
MillNewFeed= \begin{bmatrix} | \mathit{MillNewFeed} = \begin{bmatrix} | ||
(Q_{\rm M,F})_{11}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,F})_{1m}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | (Q_{\rm M,F})_{11}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,F})_{1m}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | ||
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ | \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ | ||
(Q_{\rm M,F})_{ | (Q_{\rm M,F})_{r1}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,F})_{rm}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | \end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | ||
\mathit{OreSG} = \begin{bmatrix} | |||
( | (\rho_{\rm S})_{1}\text{ (t/m}^\text{3}\text{)} & \dots & (\rho_{\rm S})_m\text{ (t/m}^\text{3}\text{)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | |||
</math> | |||
\end{bmatrix} | |||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
\mathit{BallSizing} = \begin{bmatrix} | |||
( | (d_{\rm B})_1 \text{ (mm)} & (\mathit{MF}_{\rm B})_1\text{ (}%\text{ w/w)}\\ | ||
\vdots& \vdots\\ | |||
(d_{\rm B})_s \text{ (mm)} & (\mathit{MF}_{\rm B})_s\text{ (}%\text{ w/w)}\\ | |||
( | |||
\end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | \end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | ||
RConst= \begin{bmatrix} | \mathit{RConst} = \begin{bmatrix} | ||
{\rm | \mathit{RConst}_1 \text{ (} \ln \rm h^{-1} \text{)}\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
{\rm | \mathit{RConst}_5 \text{ (} \ln \rm h^{-1} \text{)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | \end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | ||
OreBreakageParams= | \mathit{OreBreakageParams} = | ||
\begin{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
A_1 & \dots & | A_1\text{ (}%\text{ w/w)} & \dots & A_m\text{ (}%\text{ w/w)}\\ | ||
b_1 & \dots & | b_1 & \dots & b_m\\ | ||
(t_{\rm a})_1 & \dots & (t_{\rm a}) | (t_{\rm a})_1\text{ (}%\text{ w/w)} & \dots & (t_{\rm a})_m\text{ (}%\text{ w/w)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix},\quad | ||
\mathit{MillRecycleFeed} = \begin{bmatrix} | |||
(Q_{\rm M,R})_{11}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,R})_{1m}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | |||
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ | |||
(Q_{\rm M,R})_{r1}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,R})_{rm}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | |||
\end{bmatrix}^* | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
where: | where: | ||
* <math>(Q_{\rm M,F})_{\rm L}</math> is the mass flow feed rate of liquids into the mill (t/h) | * <math>(Q_{\rm M,F})_{\rm L}</math> is the mass flow feed rate of liquids into the mill (t/h) | ||
* <math>\rho_{\rm L}</math> is the Specific Gravity or density of liquids in the feed (- or t/m<sup>3</sup>) | * <math>\rho_{\rm L}</math> is the Specific Gravity or density of liquids in the feed (- or t/m<sup>3</sup>) | ||
* <math> | * <math>u</math> is an index of the Appearance function to view in the results | ||
* <math> | * <math>v</math> is an index of the Appearance function to view in the results | ||
* <math>m</math> is the number of ore types | * <math>m</math> is the number of ore types | ||
* <math> | * <math>r</math> is the number of intervals of the external mesh series | ||
* <math> | * <math>s</math> is the number of intervals of the ball mesh series below the top size, including the submesh | ||
* <math> | * <math>\hat{d}_i</math> is the size of the external square mesh interval that feed mass is retained on (mm) | ||
* <math>\hat{d}_{i+1}<\hat{d}_i<\hat{d}_{i-1}</math>, i.e. descending size order from top size (<math>\hat{d}_{1}</math>) to sub mesh (<math>\hat{d}_{p}=0</math>) | |||
* <math>(d_{\rm B})_i</math> is the size of the square mesh interval that balls are retained on (mm) | |||
* <math>{ | * <math>(\mathit{MF}_{\rm B})_i</math> is the mass fraction of balls retained on ball mesh series interval <math>i</math> (% w/w) | ||
* <math>^*</math> indicates the <math>\mathit{MillRecycleFeed}</math> array is an optional input parameter, and is set to null if omitted | * <math>^*</math> indicates the <math>\mathit{MillRecycleFeed}</math> array is an optional input parameter, and is set to null if omitted | ||
Line 140: | Line 633: | ||
\text{Iterations}\\ | \text{Iterations}\\ | ||
\text{Iteration error}\\ | \text{Iteration error}\\ | ||
\text{ | V\text{ (m}^{\text{3}}\text{)}\\ | ||
\text{Mill speed (rpm)}\\ | \text{Mill speed (rpm)}\\ | ||
Q_{\rm V,F}\\ | Q_{\rm V,F}\\ | ||
Line 152: | Line 645: | ||
m_1\text{ (-)}\\ | m_1\text{ (-)}\\ | ||
m_2\text{ (-)}\\ | m_2\text{ (-)}\\ | ||
d_{\rm | d_{\rm max}\text{ (h}^{-1}\text{)}\\ | ||
S_{20}\text{ (mm)}\\ | S_{20}\text{ (mm)}\\ | ||
E_q\text{ (kWh)}\\ | |||
\rho_{\rm c}\text{ (t/m}^3\text{)}\\ | \rho_{\rm c}\text{ (t/m}^3\text{)}\\ | ||
\theta_{\rm S}\text{ (rad)}\\ | \theta_{\rm S}\text{ (rad)}\\ | ||
Line 169: | Line 662: | ||
\begin{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
\hat{d}_1\text{ (mm)}\\ | |||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
\hat{d}_q\text{ (mm)} | |||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 179: | Line 672: | ||
(Q_{\rm M,P})_{11}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,P})_{1m}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | (Q_{\rm M,P})_{11}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,P})_{1m}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | ||
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ | \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ | ||
(Q_{\rm M,P})_{ | (Q_{\rm M,P})_{q1}\text{ (t/h)} & \dots & (Q_{\rm M,P})_{qm}\text{ (t/h)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 185: | Line 678: | ||
\begin{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
(M_{\rm S})_{11}\text{ (t | (M_{\rm S})_{11}\text{ (t)} & \dots & (M_{\rm S})_{1m}\text{ (t)}\\ | ||
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ | \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ | ||
(M_{\rm S})_{ | (M_{\rm S})_{q1}\text{ (t)} & \dots & (M_{\rm S})_{qm}\text{ (t)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 195: | Line 688: | ||
d_1\text{ (mm)}\\ | d_1\text{ (mm)}\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
d_n\text{ (mm)} | |||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 202: | Line 695: | ||
\bar{d}_1\text{ (mm)}\\ | \bar{d}_1\text{ (mm)}\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
\bar{d} | \bar{d}_n\text{ (mm)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 210: | Line 703: | ||
D_{1}\left(\text{h}^\text{-1}\right)\\ | D_{1}\left(\text{h}^\text{-1}\right)\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
D_n\left(\text{h}^\text{-1}\right)\\ | |||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 218: | Line 711: | ||
R_{1}\left(\text{h}^\text{-1}\right)\\ | R_{1}\left(\text{h}^\text{-1}\right)\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
R_n\left(\text{h}^\text{-1}\right)\\ | |||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 226: | Line 719: | ||
(E_{\rm cs})_{1}\text{ (kWh/t)}\\ | (E_{\rm cs})_{1}\text{ (kWh/t)}\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
(E_{\rm cs}) | (E_{\rm cs})_n\text{ (kWh/t)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 232: | Line 725: | ||
\begin{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
A_{ | A_{u1}\text{ (frac)}\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
A_{ | A_{un}\text{ (frac)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
Line 240: | Line 733: | ||
\begin{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
A_{ | A_{v1}\text{ (frac)}\\ | ||
\vdots\\ | \vdots\\ | ||
A_{ | A_{vn}\text{ (frac)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix}\\ | \end{bmatrix}\\ | ||
Line 277: | Line 770: | ||
* <math>\text{Iteration error}</math> is the numerical error of the converged load approximation | * <math>\text{Iteration error}</math> is the numerical error of the converged load approximation | ||
* <math>Q_{\rm V,F}</math> is the flow rate of pulp into the mill (m<sup>3</sup>/h) | * <math>Q_{\rm V,F}</math> is the flow rate of pulp into the mill (m<sup>3</sup>/h) | ||
* <math>\text{Mill speed}</math> is the [[Tumbling Mill (Speed)|rotational rate of the mill]] (rpm) | * <math>\text{Mill speed}</math> is the [[Tumbling Mill (Speed)|rotational rate of the mill]] (rpm) | ||
* <math>M_{\rm S}</math> is the mass of ore solids in the mill (t) | * <math>M_{\rm S}</math> is the mass of ore solids in the mill (t) | ||
Line 283: | Line 775: | ||
* <math>M_{\rm B}</math> is the mass of balls in the mill (t) | * <math>M_{\rm B}</math> is the mass of balls in the mill (t) | ||
* <math>M</math> is the total mass of ore, liquids and balls in the mill (t) | * <math>M</math> is the total mass of ore, liquids and balls in the mill (t) | ||
* <math>Q_{\rm M,P}</math> is product mass flow rate (t/h) | * <math>Q_{\rm M,P}</math> is product mass flow rate (t/h) | ||
* <math>\bar{d}_i</math> is the [[Conversions|geometric mean size]] of the internal mesh series interval that mass is retained on (mm) | * <math>\bar{d}_i</math> is the [[Conversions|geometric mean size]] of the internal mesh series interval that mass is retained on (mm) | ||
=== Example === | === Example === | ||
Line 311: | Line 784: | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" | |- style="vertical-align:top;" | ||
| [[File:AGSAGVariableRates1.png|left|frame|Figure | | [[File:AGSAGVariableRates1.png|left|frame|Figure 8. Example showing the selection of the '''Parameters''' (blue frame) array in Excel.]] | ||
| [[File:AGSAGVariableRates2.png|left|frame|Figure | | [[File:AGSAGVariableRates2.png|left|frame|Figure 9. Example showing the selection of the '''Size''' (dark red frame), '''OreSG''' (green frame), '''MillNewFeed''' (purple frame) and '''MillRecycleFeed''' (light red frame) arrays in Excel.]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" | |- style="vertical-align:top;" | ||
| [[File:AGSAGVariableRates3.png|left|frame|Figure | | [[File:AGSAGVariableRates3.png|left|frame|Figure 10. Example showing the selection of the '''BallSizing''' (purple frame), '''RConst''' (brown frame), and '''OreBreakageParams''' (teal frame) arrays in Excel.]] | ||
| [[File:AGSAGVariableRates4.png|left|frame|Figure | | [[File:AGSAGVariableRates4.png|left|frame|Figure 11. Example showing the outline of the '''Results''' (light blue frame) array in Excel.]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 402: | Line 875: | ||
|Input | |Input | ||
|Density (Specific Gravity) of ball media. | |Density (Specific Gravity) of ball media. | ||
|- | |||
|NumBallMeshSizes | |||
|Input | |||
|Number of ball mesh sizes below the top size, including the submesh. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|BallTopSize | |BallTopSize | ||
Line 408: | Line 885: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Size | |Size | ||
| | |Input / Display | ||
|Ball sizing intervals. | |Ball sizing intervals. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Load | |Load | ||
| | |Input | ||
|Mass fraction retained of ball media in each ball sizing interval. | |Mass fraction retained of ball media in each ball sizing interval. | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 658: | Line 1,135: | ||
{{SysCAD (Page, About)}} | {{SysCAD (Page, About)}} | ||
== See also == | |||
* [[Tumbling Mill (Slurry Flow)]] | |||
* [[Tumbling Mill (Power, Morrell Continuum)]] | |||
* [[Crusher (Whiten)]] | |||
== References == | == References == |
Latest revision as of 01:33, 11 September 2024
Description
This article describes an implementation of the Autogenous (AG) and Semi-Autogenous (SAG) mill model originated by Leung (1987) and extended with variable breakage rates by Morrell and Morrison (1996).[1][2][3]
The formulation is referred to in the associated literature as the "Variable Rates" model (Morrell et al., 2001).[4]
Model theory
The schematic diagram in Figure 1 illustrates the primary processes of feed, breakage, classification and discharge occurring within AG/SAG mills.
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model ties these processes together through the perfect mixing model, which is based on a population balance of particles entering the mill, breaking into smaller sizes, and discharging as product. For a mill operating in steady-state, the diagram in Figure 2 below represents the balance for a given size fraction:
The steady-state population balance is formulated mathematically as:[5]
where:
- is the index of the size interval, , is the number of size intervals
- is the volumetric flow rate of solids of size interval in the mill feed (m3/h)
- is the volumetric flow rate of solids of size interval in the mill product (m3/h)
- is the volume of solids of size interval in the mill load (m3)
- is the breakage rate of solids of size interval in the mill load (h-1)
- is the appearance function, the distribution of particle volume arising from the breakage of a parent particle in size interval into progeny of size interval (frac)
As the mill is perfectly mixed, the product is related to the mill contents and discharge rate as:
where is the rate of discharge of solids in size interval from the mill (h-1).
Therefore, the mill load at steady-state can be computed from:
and the product subsequently determined.
Liquids retained in the mill at steady-state are similarly determined from:
where:
- is the load volume of liquids in the mill (m3)
- is the volumetric feed rate of liquids into the mill (m3/h)
- is the discharge rate of liquids from the mill, normally assumed to equal (h-1).
Calculation sequence
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model uses a range of sub-models to quantify the breakage rate (), appearance function (), and discharge function () terms of the perfect mixing model, and hence compute the mill load () and product () at steady-state.
These sub-models are strongly interactive, and an iterative calculation sequence is necessary to numerically solve the steady-state population balance. The required calculation sequence is presented in Figure 3.
The sub-models are described in further detail below.
Breakage rates
The breakage rate at each size interval, (h-1), is generated by cubic spline interpolation between five breakage rate knots () at the 0.25, 4, 16, 44 and 128 mm particle size positions.[2]
Morrell and Morrison (1996) described the following set of empirical equations which relate the breakage rate knots to mill operating conditions:[3]
where:
- are user-defined constants which can be used to adjust modelled breakage rates to observed values
- is the fraction of total mill volume occupied by balls and associated voids (% v/v)
- is the 80% passing size of new feed (mm)
- are the regression coefficients specified in Table 1.
Table 1. Breakage rate regression coefficients (after Morrell and Morrison, 1996).[3] 1 2.504 4.682 3.141 1.057 1.894 2 0.397 0.468 0.402 0.333 0.014 3 0.597 0.327 4.632 0.171 0.473 4 0.192 0.0085 - 0.0014 0.002 5 0.002 - - - -
The mill rotational speed scaling factor, , is computed from the mill rotational speed (rpm) as:
Similarly, the mill fraction critical speed scaling factor, , is computed from the mill fraction critical speed, (frac), as:
The ball diameter scaling factor, , is computed from the ball top size, (mm), as:
The recycle ratio, , is the ratio of the mass flowrate of recycled -20+4 mm material to the total mass flowrate of all new feed plus recycled -20+4 mm material, i.e.
where:
- is new feed mass flow rate (t/h)
- is recycle feed mass flow rate (t/h)
- and are the fraction of recycle feed passing 20 mm and 4 mm size, respectively (frac)
The recycle ratio, , is only applicable when the coarse recycled feed component consists of mill pebbles (scats) which have not undergone an intervening breakage step such as pebble crushing.
Figure 4 presents an example breakage rate distribution constructed from the five breakage rate knots and a continuous cubic spline.
Discharge rates
The discharge rates () are related to the hold-up of slurry in the mill and particle classification at the discharge grates.
Slurry hold-up
The volumetric flow rate of slurry discharged from a grated mill depends on the level of slurry hold-up within the mill, in a manner analogous to flow from the bottom of a filled tank.
In a steady-state model, the discharge flow rate is equal to the feed flow rate by definition. The following empirical relationship is used to estimate slurry hold-up in a grated mill for a given discharge flow rate:[1]
where:
- is the fraction of mill volume occupied by below grate size solids and water (v/v)
- is the volumetric flow rate of slurry discharged from the mill (m3/min)
- is a constant related to grate design and mill speed
- is a constant assumed to take the value of 0.5.[6]
The volume of the mill, , is calculated as the sum of a cylinder and two right circular frustums:[7]
where:
- is the radius of the mill inside the liners (m), equal to half of the diameter of the mill inside the liners, (m)
- is the radius of the discharge trunnion (m), equal to half of the diameter of the discharge trunnion, (m)
- is the length of the cylindrical (belly) section of the mill (m)
- is the cone angle, measured as the angular displacement of the cone surface from the vertical direction (rad)
The principal dimensions of an AG/SAG mill required to compute mill volume and other properties are shown in Figure 5.
Morrell and Stephenson (1996) related discharge flow rate to slurry hold-up, grate design and mill speed with the following semi-empirical relation:[8]
where
- is the volumetric discharge rate of slurry through the grinding media zone (m3/h)
- is the slurry discharge coefficient for the grinding media zone
- is the net fractional slurry hold-up in the grinding media interstices (v/v)
- is the total open area of grate apertures (m2)
- is the fraction critical speed of the mill (frac)
- is the mill diameter (m)
and the mean radial position of the grate apertures, (m/m), is defined as:
where:
- is the open area of all holes (m2) at radial position (m)
- is the radius of the mill inside the liners (m)
In addition to fine slurry, particles up to the the grate aperture size will also discharge from the mill. To estimate total discharge flow rate, (m3/h), Morrell and Stephenson (1996) suggest the following correction:[8]
where is a factor to account for coarse material, and taking the values shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Applied values for .[8] Aperture Grates only; <19mm 1.07 Grates only; 19mm - 28mm 1.125 Grates >38mm or pebble ports 1.2
The value of for a given grate design and mill can be determined by observing that and in the above equations, i.e.:[6]
The mill volume, , can expressed as the product of the mill cross sectional area and an equivalent grinding length, (m), i.e.:
Furthermore, the total open area of the grates, (m2), can be replaced with an expression combining the grate open area fraction, (m2/m2), and mill cross-sectional area:
Replacing the and terms in the equation above yields:
Thus, slurry hold-up, , can be computed for a given feed/discharge flow rate, grate design and mill.
Classification and discharge
The discharge rate of solids from the grate of a perfectly mixed mill is:[6]
where:
and:
- is the fraction of load presented to the mill discharge per unit of time (h-1)
- is the classification function, the fraction of particles of size reporting to the mill product (frac)
- is the geometric mean size of particles in size interval (mm)
- is the particle size below which all mass in the size interval reports to mill product (mm), i.e. like water
- is the grate aperture size (mm)
- is the pebble port size (mm)
- is the fraction of open area occupied by pebble ports (m2/m2)
Figure 6 shows an example classification function with pebble ports included, whilst Figure 7 shows the same function with a grate-only mill.
The value of is adjusted during the calculation sequence (Figure 3) to ensure the fraction of solids less than plus water retained in the mill load computed by the perfect mixing population balance matches the slurry hold-up determined by the slurry flow calculations.
Appearance function
The appearance function, , is defined as the mass-by-size distribution of progeny particles resulting from the breakage of parent particles.
Two types of particle breakage are theorised to occur occur within AG/SAG mills:
- High energy breakage from the impact of cataracting balls and large rocks at the toe of the charge, and
- Low energy breakage from the abrasion and attrition of particles within the charge bed.
The appearance function for an AG/SAG mill is constructed from the combination of appearance functions for the high energy, , and low energy, , breakage regimes.
An appearance function is a lower triangular matrix as all broken particles are, by definition, smaller than their parent particle.
High energy
Leung et al. (1987) related the amount of energy available for high energy impact breakage in a mill to the mean size of the top 20% of the charge, (mm). The is defined as:[2]
where is the size passing fraction (mm) of the charge, which includes ore and balls (if present).
A particle of representative size falling through the full height of the mill converts the following potential energy into impact (kinetic) energy:
where:
- is the energy level in the mill applied to particles in size fraction (kWh)
- is defined as the index of the size interval containing the largest particle in the feed,
- is the density of solids in the mill (t/m3)
- is acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)
- is the mil diameter (m)
and the above equation has been corrected from Leung et al. (1987) for particle radius and measurement units.
The energy level, , is converted to the specific comminution energy applied to a particle in size fraction , (kWh/t), by:[9]
where is the geometric mean size (mm) of a particle in size interval , and the equation is again corrected for radius and units.
The specific comminution energy is scaled to smaller size fractions by:[9]
To compute the high energy appearance function, the fraction of particles passing one-tenth of the initial mean particle, the (frac), is determined for the specific comminution energy applied at each size:[2]
where and are ore-specific hardness parameters obtained from a drop weight test.[1]
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model uses the standard matrix of cumulative fraction passing data points in Table 3 to describe the products of a high breakage event for any ore type.[1]
Each element of the matrix, , represents the percentage fraction of progeny particles passing one-th of the original parent particle geometric mean size, when % of the products pass one-tenth of the original product size (i.e. the ).
Table 3. Standard appearance function data used in the Variable Rates AG/SAG model.[1] 2.33 3.06 4.98 23.33 50.53 6.89 9.41 15.62 61.58 92.49 10.32 14.71 25.88 82.86 96.47
This matrix allows a complete breakage product size distribution for any parent size and mesh series to be reconstructed from the via the following steps:
- A cubic spline is used to interpolate - values for the at each particle size fraction's specific comminution energy.
- A secondary cubic spline interpolation is used to produce a distribution across the full mesh size interval range for each parent particle size.
The Whiten crusher model also applies a similar appearance function spline interpolation procedure.
Ball load
Semi-Autogenous (SAG) mills add steel ball grinding media to the ore charge to increase size reduction.
The mass of balls in a mill, (t), is related to the volume occupied by the balls by:[10]
where
- is the fraction of mill volume occupied by balls and the void space between them, when the mill is at rest (v/v)
- is the void fraction, taken as 0.4 (v/v)
The calculation of specific comminution energy for the high energy appearance function above uses the average size of the top 20% of the charge, the . A charge that includes balls must incorporate the media load into the calculation of the . This is achieved by considering the ball load as if each ball were an ore particle with the same mass, but a larger diameter to compensate for the density difference between steel and rock, i.e.:[2]
where:
- and are the mass and volume of a ball, respectively.
- is the density of a ball
- is the diameter of a ball
- is the volume of an ore particle
- is the density of ore solids in the charge
- is the diameter of an ore particle with equivalent mass to a ball
Therefore, a weight fraction retained distribution of balls on any size interval series is incorporated into the the calculation by the following steps:
- Scale the ball size intervals () to equivalent ore size intervals () as per the equation above.
- Use a monotonic spline to convert the ball distribution from the scaled equivalent ore size intervals () to the size intervals used by the perfect mixing population balance formulation ().
- Convert the weight fraction retained ball distribution to a mass retained distribution using the ball mass, .
- Convert the mass retained ball distribution to a volume retained distribution using the ore density, .
- Combine the ball volume-by-size and ore volume-by-size in the charge () when computing the .
Low energy
The low energy appearance function is computed from the ore-specific abrasion parameter, (%), which is obtained from the ore abrasion test described by Napier-Munn et al. (1996).[1]
The cumulative fraction passing distribution of progeny particles arising from the abrasion breakage of a parent particle is computed by multiplying the for a given ore by the scaling factors indicated in Table 4.[2]
Table 4. Standard abrasion appearance function data.[2] Cumulative fraction passing (%)
The low energy appearance function is then determined for all parent particle sizes and across the full mesh series by spline interpolation of the cumulative fraction passing values computed above.
Note that a monotonic spline is employed for the low energy appearance function as the sharp change in cumulative fraction passing values between the original parent size () and the first progeny size () can result in undesired oscillation and negative function values when applying a regular cubic spline.
Combined appearance function
The high and low energy appearance functions are combined based on the relative proportions of and the at each specific comminution energy:[2]
Mill power
The Variable Rates AG/SAG model includes an implementation of the Morrell Continuum tumbling mill power model. The predicted mill power draw is not utilised by the Variable Rates model formulation in any manner, and is provided for information only.
Charge properties
The power draw prediction requires an estimate of (v/v), the fraction of mill volume occupied by the charge, which includes coarse ore, balls, slurry, and void spaces.
Morrell (1992) provides relations for the mass of coarse ore, slurried ore, water and balls in a mill.[10] Converting from mass to fraction of mill volume, these relations are:
where:
- , , , and are the volumes of coarse ore, slurried ore, liquids, and balls in the mill, respectively (m3)
- is the volume fraction of solids in the mill discharge (v/v)
- is the fraction of void space between the coarse ore particles and balls that is filled with slurry (v/v)
The total volume of ore in the mill, (m3), is computed by the perfect mixing model, i.e.:
Subtracting the slurried ore component from the total ore volume, the coarse ore volume is:
and rearranging for yields:
The value of in the above equation is unknown, and is itself a function of . To simplify the calculations, is estimated for a given mill load and discharge by assuming .
Having computed an estimate for , the value of may be approximated by:
and the apparent density of the charge, , is:[11]
Power draw
- Main article: Tumbling Mill (Power, Morrell Continuum)
This implementation of the Variable Rates AG/SAG model applies Morrell's (1996) tumbling mill power draw equations for a grated mill which include terms for the conical end sections of the mill.[11][9]
The values of , , and , plus mill dimensions and rotational speed are inputs to the power draw estimation equations.
The equations return the following charge position and power draw results:
- The angular position of the charge shoulder, (rad)
- The angular position of the charge toe, (rad)
- The charge surface radius, (m)
- The no-load power of the mill, (kW)
- The net power of the mill, (kW)
- The gross power of the mill, (kW)
The complete equations are excluded here for brevity and are available at the article link above.
Internal mesh series
The Variable Rates AG/SAG mill model is formulated internally with a geometric progression of mesh sizes at intervals, i.e.
where (mm) is the top size of the internal mesh series.
Feed, load and product size fractions are automatically converted to and from the internal mesh series during model computation.
The internal mesh series chosen can have an impact on the calculated value of via the parameter, which subsequently affects the computed mill load and discharge. As such, the internal mesh top size, , is specified by the user. This ensures consistency when model parameters are transferred from once instance to another.
Multicomponent modelling
Published formulations of the Variable Rates AG/SAG model and its predecessors only consider feeds and loads consisting of a single ore type.[2][6][9]
In practice, mill feeds are often multicomponent, consisting of ores and minerals blended from multiple, differing sources. Recirculation of coarse, harder material for additional grinding passes adds to this complexity.
This implementation of the Variable Rates AG/SAG model addresses multicomponent feeds in a simple way:[9]
- Each ore type in a mill feed is assigned a separate set of density () and hardness (, , ) parameters.
- Ore masses-by-size are converted to volumes-by-size via the density parameters.
- The parameter value is determined on a volumetric basis for the combined ore types (and balls).
- The parameter value is determined using the overall density of all ore types in the mill load (i.e. the harmonic mean).
- Different appearance functions are then applied to separate population balance computations for each ore type in the feed.
This multicomponent approach allows harder and coarser ore particles to accumulate in the mill load and preferentially concentrate in coarse recycle streams, as would be expected in practice.
Multiple ore types are excluded from the model formulations found in the previous sections of this article for clarity, but steps 1 - 5 above are automatically undertaken during model calculation.
The multicomponent formulation reverts to the original single ore approach when only one ore type is present, or each ore type of a multicomponent feed is assigned the same values of , , , and .
Additional notes
Breakage rates and mill load
An important, and potentially overlooked, limitation of the Variable Rates AG/SAG mill model is the insensitivity of the breakage rate relationships to mill load. Mill simulations should therefore use mill loads close or equal to the load observed during model fitting, or 25% for design activities.[12]
Slurry pool
Various published descriptions of the Variable Rates AG/SAG mill suggest that slurry pooling phenomena are excluded from slurry hold-up and power draw estimations.[3][6][9]
This implementation similarly excludes slurry pooling, and any model results returning values of should be inspected carefully.
Excel
The Variable Rates AG/SAG mill model may be invoked from the Excel formula bar with the following function call:
=mdUnit_AGSAG_VariableRates(Parameters as Range, Size as Range, MillNewFeed as Range, OreSG as Range, BallSizing as Range, RConst as Range, OreBreakageParams as Range, Optional MillRecycleFeed as Range = Nothing)
Invoking the function with no arguments will print Help text associated with the model, including a link to this page.
Inputs
The required inputs are defined below in matrix notation with elements corresponding to cells in Excel row () x column () format:
where:
- is the mass flow feed rate of liquids into the mill (t/h)
- is the Specific Gravity or density of liquids in the feed (- or t/m3)
- is an index of the Appearance function to view in the results
- is an index of the Appearance function to view in the results
- is the number of ore types
- is the number of intervals of the external mesh series
- is the number of intervals of the ball mesh series below the top size, including the submesh
- is the size of the external square mesh interval that feed mass is retained on (mm)
- , i.e. descending size order from top size () to sub mesh ()
- is the size of the square mesh interval that balls are retained on (mm)
- is the mass fraction of balls retained on ball mesh series interval (% w/w)
- indicates the array is an optional input parameter, and is set to null if omitted
Results
The results are displayed in Excel as an array corresponding to the matrix notation below:
where:
- is the number of internal computation steps required to converge the load
- is the numerical error of the converged load approximation
- is the flow rate of pulp into the mill (m3/h)
- is the rotational rate of the mill (rpm)
- is the mass of ore solids in the mill (t)
- is the mass of liquids in the mill (t)
- is the mass of balls in the mill (t)
- is the total mass of ore, liquids and balls in the mill (t)
- is product mass flow rate (t/h)
- is the geometric mean size of the internal mesh series interval that mass is retained on (mm)
Example
The images below show the selection of input arrays and output results in the Excel interface.
SysCAD
The sections and variable names used in the SysCAD interface are described in detail in the following tables.
MD_Mill page
The first tab page in the access window will have this name.
Tag (Long/Short) | Input / Display | Description/Calculated Variables/Options |
---|---|---|
Tag | Display | This name tag may be modified with the change tag option. |
Condition | Display | OK if no errors/warnings, otherwise lists errors/warnings. |
ConditionCount | Display | The current number of errors/warnings. If condition is OK, returns 0. |
GeneralDescription / GenDesc | Display | This is an automatically generated description for the unit. If the user has entered text in the 'EqpDesc' field on the Info tab (see below), this will be displayed here.
If this field is blank, then SysCAD will display the unit class ID. |
Requirements | ||
On | CheckBox | This enables the unit. If this box is not checked, then the material will pass straight through the mill with no change to the size distribution. |
Method | Fixed Discharge | The discharge particle size distribution is user defined. Different distributions can be used for different solids. |
AG/SAG (Variable Rates) | The Variable Rates AG/SAG mill model is used to determine the mill product size distribution. Different parameters can be used for different solids. | |
Rod Mill (Lynch) | The Lynch rod mill model is used to determine the mill product size distribution. Different parameters can be used for different solids. | |
Ball (Perfect Mixing) | The Perfect Mixing ball mill model (steady-state or dynamic) is used to determine the mill product size distribution. Different parameters can be used for different solids. | |
Stirred (Perfect Mixing) | The Perfect Mixing stirred mill model (steady-state or dynamic) is used to determine the mill product size distribution. Different parameters can be used for different solids. | |
Mill (Herbst-Fuerstenau) | The Herbst-Fuerstenau model is used to determine the mill product size distribution. Different parameters can be used for different solids. | |
PowerModels | CheckBox | Show alternative mill power model calculations on the Power page. |
MediaTrajectory | CheckBox | Show mill media rolling, sliding and free flight trajectory computations on the MediaTraj page. |
MediaStrings | CheckBox | Show media size distributions at recharge equilibrium on the MediaStrings page. |
Options | ||
ShowQFeed | CheckBox | QFeed and associated tab pages (eg Sp) will become visible, showing the properties of the combined feed stream. |
ShowQProd | CheckBox | QProd and associated tab pages (eg Sp) will become visible, showing the properties of the products. |
SizeForPassingFracCalc | Input | Size fraction for % Passing calculation. The size fraction input here will be shown in the Stream Summary section. |
FracForPassingSizeCalc | Input | Fraction passing for Size calculation. The fraction input here will be shown in the Stream Summary section. |
Stream Summary | ||
MassFlow / Qm | Display | The total mass flow in each stream. |
SolidMassFlow / SQm | Display | The Solids mass flow in each stream. |
LiquidMassFlow / LQm | Display | The Liquid mass flow in each stream. |
VolFlow / Qv | Display | The total Volume flow in each stream. |
Temperature / T | Display | The Temperature of each stream. |
Density / Rho | Display | The Density of each stream. |
SolidFrac / Sf | Display | The Solid Fraction in each stream. |
LiquidFrac / Lf | Display | The Liquid Fraction in each stream. |
Passing | Display | The mass fraction passing the user-specified size (in the field SizeForPassingFracCalc) in each stream. |
Passes | Display | The user-specified (in the field FracForPassesSizeCalc) fraction of material in each stream will pass this size fraction. |
Mill page
The Mill page is used to specify the input parameters for the mill model.
Ore page
This page is used to define the comminution properties of SysCAD species with the size distribution quality in the project.
Results page
This page is used to display the model results.
Tag (Long/Short) | Input / Display | Description/Calculated Variables/Options |
---|---|---|
Results | ||
Solver | ||
Iterations | Display | Number of iterations to converge internal load solver. |
IterationError | Display | Numerical approximation error of internal load solver. |
Mill Properties | ||
MillVolume | Display | Internal volume of the mill. |
MillSpeed | Display | Rotational speed of the mill. |
MillFeedRate / Feed.SLQv | Display | Volumetric feed rate of pulp into the mill. |
Mill Contents | ||
OreMass | Display | Mass of ore (solids with PSD) in the mill. |
LiquidMass | Display | Mass of liquids in the mill. |
BallMass | Display | Mass of ball media in the mill. |
TotalChargeMass | Display | Total mass of ore, liquids and balls in the mill. |
VolTotalLoad | Display | Volumetric fraction of mill volume of total charge (ore, liquids, balls and void space). |
Mill Discharge | ||
m1 | Display | Parameter of the Austin mill holdup relationship. |
m2 | Display | Parameter of the Austin mill holdup relationship. |
dMax | Display | Maximum discharge rate of load volume through the grate. |
Charge Properties | ||
S20 | Display | Size of the top (largest) 20% of the load. |
ChargeDensity | Display | Density of the charge. |
U | Display | Fraction of charge void space filled with slurry. |
ThetaShoulder | Display | Angular position of the charge shoulder. |
ThetaTue | Display | Angular position of the charge toe. |
ChargeSurfaceRadius | Display | Radius of the inner charge surface. |
Power | ||
NoLoadPower | Display | No-load power draw of the mill. |
NetPower | Display | Net power draw of the mill. |
GrossPower | Display | Gross power draw of the mill. |
RiDi page
This page displays the breakage and discharge rates for each size interval computed by the model.
Tag (Long/Short) | Input / Display | Description/Calculated Variables/Options |
---|---|---|
Rates | ||
Size | Display | Size of each interval in internal mesh series. |
MeanSize | Display | Geometric mean size of each interval in internal mesh series. |
R | Display | Value of breakage rate, , for each size interval, for each ore species. |
D | Display | Value of discharge rate, , for each size interval. |
Ecs | Display | Value of the specific comminution energy for each size interval. |
Load page
This page displays information about the balls, solids and liquids that currently comprise the mill load.
Tag (Long/Short) | Input / Display | Description/Calculated Variables/Options |
---|---|---|
Distribution | ||
Name | Display | Shows the name of the SysCAD Size Distribution (PSD) quality associated with the feed stream. |
IntervalCount | Display | Shows the number of size intervals in the SysCAD Size Distribution (PSD) quality associated with the feed stream. |
SpWithPSDCount | Display | Shows the number of species in the feed stream assigned with the SysCAD Size Distribution (PSD) quality. |
Load | ||
SolidMass / SMt | Display | The mass of solids with the SysCAD size distribution property currently in the mill. |
LiquidMass / LMt | Display | The mass of liquids plus solids without the SysCAD size distribution property currently in the mill. |
BallMass / BMt | Display | The mass of ball media in the mill. |
Size | Display | Size of each interval in the external mesh series. |
MeanSize | Display | Geometric mean size of each interval in the external mesh series. |
Load | Display | The mass of solids with the SysCAD size distribution property currently in the mill, by size and species. |
Power page
This optional page displays the inputs and results for alternative mill power models. The page is only visible if PowerModels is selected on the MD_Mill page.
Tag (Long/Short) | Input / Display | Description/Calculated Variables/Options |
---|---|---|
Power | ||
HoggFuerstenau | CheckBox | Shows inputs and results for tumbling mill power calculations using the Hogg and Fuerstenau method. |
MorrellC | CheckBox | Shows inputs and results for tumbling mill power calculations using the Morrell Continuum method. |
MorrellE | CheckBox | Shows inputs and results for tumbling mill power calculations using the Morrell Empirical method. |
MorrellD | CheckBox | Shows inputs and results for tumbling mill power calculations using the Morrell Discrete Shell method. |
HildenPowell | CheckBox | Shows inputs and results for tumbling mill power calculations using the Hilden and Powell method. |
MediaStrings page
This page displays the inputs and results for grinding mill media string calculations. The page is only visible if MediaStrings is selected on the MD_Mill page.
MediaTraj page
This page displays the inputs and results for tumbling mill media trajectory calculations. The page is only visible if MediaTrajectory is selected on the MD_Mill page.
About page
This page is provides product and licensing information about the Met Dynamics Models SysCAD Add-On.
Tag (Long/Short) | Input / Display | Description/Calculated Variables/Options |
---|---|---|
About | ||
HelpLink | Opens a link to the Installation and Licensing page using the system default web browser. Note: Internet access is required. | |
Information | Copies Product and License information to the Windows clipboard. | |
Product | ||
Name | Display | Met Dynamics software product name |
Version | Display | Met Dynamics software product version number. |
BuildDate | Display | Build date and time of the Met Dynamics Models SysCAD Add-On. |
License | ||
File | This is used to locate a Met Dynamics software license file. | |
Location | Display | Type of Met Dynamics software license or file name and path of license file. |
SiteCode | Display | Unique machine identifier for license authorisation. |
ReqdAuth | Display | Authorisation level required, MD-SysCAD Full or MD-SysCAD Runtime. |
Status | Display | License status, LICENSE_OK indicates a valid license, other messages report licensing errors. |
IssuedTo | Display | Only visible if Met Dynamics license file is used. Name of organisation/seat the license is authorised to. |
ExpiryDate | Display | Only visible if Met Dynamics license file is used. License expiry date. |
DaysLeft | Display | Only visible if Met Dynamics license file is used. Days left before the license expires. |
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Napier-Munn, T.J., Morrell, S., Morrison, R.D. and Kojovic, T., 1996. Mineral comminution circuits: their operation and optimisation. Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, Indooroopilly, QLD.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Leung, K., Morrison, R.D. and Whiten, W.J., 1987. An Energy Based Ore Specific Model for Autogenous and Semi-autogenous Grinding, Copper 87, Vina del Mar, Vol. 2, pp 71 - 86
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Morrell, S. and Morrison, R.D., 1996. AG and SAG mill circuit selection and design by simulation. In International Conference on Autogenous and Semiautogenous Grinding Technology (Vol. 2, pp. 769-790).
- ↑ Morrell, S., Valery, W., Banini, G. and Latchireddi, S., 2001. Developments in AG/SAG mill modelling. Proceedings of Autogenous and Semiautogenous Grinding Technology, Vancouver, pp.71-84.
- ↑ Valery Jnr, W. and Morrell, S., 1995. The development of a dynamic model for autogenous and semi-autogenous grinding. Minerals engineering, 8(11), pp.1285-1297.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Kojovic, T., Hilden, M.M., Powell, M.S. and Bailey, C., 2012. Updated Julius Kruttschnitt semi-autogenous grinding mill model, Proceedings: 11th AusIMM Mill Operators' Conference 2012. Hobart, Victoria, 29-31 October 2012. AusIMM: Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
- ↑ Gupta, A. and Yan, D.S., 2016. Mineral processing design and operations: an introduction. Elsevier.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Morrell, S. and Stephenson, I., 1996. Slurry discharge capacity of autogenous and semi-autogenous mills and the effect of grate design. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 46(1-2), pp.53-72.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 Bueno, M.P., Kojovic, T., Powell, M.S. and Shi, F., 2013. Multi-component AG/SAG mill model. Minerals Engineering, 43, pp.12-21.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Morrell, S., 1992. Prediction of grinding-mill power. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall.(Sect. C: Mineral Process. Extr.), 101, pp.C25-C32.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Morrell, S., 1996. Power draw of wet tumbling mills and its relationship to charge dynamics. Pt. 1: a continuum approach to mathematical modelling of mill power draw. Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy. Section C. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 105.
- ↑ Bailey, C., Lane, G., Morrell, S. and Staples, P., 2009, October. What can go wrong in comminution circuit design? In Proceedings of the 10th Mill Operators’ Conference, Adelaide, SA.