Tumbling Mill (Power, Morrell Empirical): Difference between revisions
md>Scott.Munro m (→SysCAD) |
imported>Scott.Munro m (→Model theory) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Model theory == | == Model theory == | ||
{{Restricted content}} | |||
<hide> | |||
[[File:TumblingMillDimensions2.png|thumb|500px|Figure 1. Schematic of a tumbling mill showing key dimensions.]] | [[File:TumblingMillDimensions2.png|thumb|500px|Figure 1. Schematic of a tumbling mill showing key dimensions.]] | ||
Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
Morrell's Empirical relationship for tumbling mill power draw is: | Morrell's Empirical relationship for tumbling mill power draw is: | ||
:<math>\text{Gross power (kW)} = \text{No-load power} + \left (KD^{2.5} | :<math>\text{Gross power (kW)} = \text{No-load power} + \left (KD^{2.5}L_{\rm e} \rho_{\rm c} \alpha \delta \right )</math> | ||
where: | where: | ||
:<math>\text{No-load power} = 1.68D^{2.05} \left [\phi (0. | :<math>\text{No-load power} = 1.68D^{2.05} \left [\phi (0.667L_{\rm d}+L \right ]^{0.82}</math> | ||
:<math>\alpha = \frac{ | :<math>\alpha = \frac{J_{\rm t}(\omega - J_{\rm t})}{\omega^2}</math> | ||
:<math>\omega = 2 \left (2.9863 \phi - 2.2129 \phi^2 - 0.49267 \right )</math> | :<math>\omega = 2 \left (2.9863 \phi - 2.2129 \phi^2 - 0.49267 \right )</math> | ||
:<math>\delta = \phi \left ( 1 - \left [1 - \phi^{*}_{max} \right ] {\rm e}^{-19.42(\phi^*_{max} - \phi)} \right )</math> | :<math>\delta = \phi \left ( 1 - \left [1 - \phi^{*}_{\rm max} \right ] {\rm e}^{-19.42(\phi^*_{\rm max} - \phi)} \right )</math> | ||
:<math>\phi^*_{max} = 0.954 - 0. | :<math>\phi^*_{\rm max} = 0.954 - 0.135J_{\rm t}</math> | ||
:<math> | :<math>L_{\rm e} = L \left ( 1 + 2.28 J_{\rm t} \left [ 1 - J_{\rm t} \right ] \frac{L_{\rm d}}{L}\right )</math> | ||
:<math>\ | :<math>\rho_{\rm c} = \frac{J_{\rm t} \rho_{\rm o} \left ( 1 = E + EUS \right ) + J_{\rm B} \left ( \rho_{\rm B} - \rho_{\rm o} \right ) \left (1-E \right )}{J_{\rm t}} + \frac{J_{\rm t}EU \left (1 - S \right )}{J_{\rm t}}</math> | ||
and | and | ||
* <math>K</math> is a calibration constant, <math>K=7.98</math> for overflow mills and <math>K=9.10</math> for grate mills | * <math>K</math> is a calibration constant, <math>K=7.98</math> for overflow mills and <math>K=9.10</math> for grate mills | ||
* <math>D</math> is mill diameter inside liners (m) | * <math>D</math> is mill diameter inside liners (m) | ||
* <math> | * <math>L_{\rm e}</math> is the effective length of the mill (m) | ||
* <math>\ | * <math>\rho_{\rm c}</math> is the density of the total charge (t/m<sup>3</sup>) | ||
* <math>\phi</math> is [[Tumbling Mill (Speed)|fraction critical speed]] (frac) | * <math>\phi</math> is [[Tumbling Mill (Speed)|fraction critical speed]] (frac) | ||
* <math> | * <math>L_{\rm d}</math> is length of the cone end (m) | ||
* <math>L</math> is length of the cylindrical section (belly) of the mill inside liners (m) | * <math>L</math> is length of the cylindrical section (belly) of the mill inside liners (m) | ||
* <math>\alpha</math>, <math>\omega</math> and <math>\delta</math> are empirical parameters | * <math>\alpha</math>, <math>\omega</math> and <math>\delta</math> are empirical parameters | ||
* <math> | * <math>J_{\rm t}</math> is the volumetric fraction of the mill occupied by balls and coarse rock (v/v) | ||
* <math>\phi^*_{max}</math> is the fraction of critical speed at which power draw is maximum (frac) | * <math>\phi^*_{\rm max}</math> is the fraction of critical speed at which power draw is maximum (frac) | ||
* <math>\ | * <math>\rho_{\rm o}</math> is the density of ore (t/m<sup>3</sup>) | ||
* <math>\ | * <math>\rho_{\rm B}</math> is the density of balls (t/m<sup>3</sup>) | ||
* <math>E</math> is volumetric fraction of interstitial void space in the charge, typically 0.4 (v/v) | * <math>E</math> is volumetric fraction of interstitial void space in the charge, typically 0.4 (v/v) | ||
* <math>U</math> is the volumetric fraction of interstitial grinding media voidage occupied by slurry (v/v) | * <math>U</math> is the volumetric fraction of interstitial grinding media voidage occupied by slurry (v/v) | ||
* <math>S</math> is the volume fraction of solids in the mill discharge (v/v) | * <math>S</math> is the volume fraction of solids in the mill discharge (v/v) | ||
The length of the cone end, <math> | The length of the cone end, <math>L_{\rm d}</math> (m), is: | ||
:<math> | :<math>L_{\rm d} = (r_{\rm m} - r_{\rm t}) \tan \alpha_{c}</math> | ||
where <math>\alpha_{c}</math> is the cone angle, measured as the angular displacement of the cone surface from the vertical direction. | where <math>\alpha_{c}</math> is the cone angle, measured as the angular displacement of the cone surface from the vertical direction. | ||
</hide> | |||
== Excel == | == Excel == | ||
Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
D\text{ (m)}\\ | D\text{ (m)}\\ | ||
L\text{ (m)}\\ | L\text{ (m)}\\ | ||
D_{\rm t}\text{ (m)}\\ | |||
\alpha_{c}\text{ (degrees)}\\ | \alpha_{c}\text{ (degrees)}\\ | ||
\phi\text{ (frac)}\\ | \phi\text{ (frac)}\\ | ||
J_{\rm t}\text{ (v/v)}\\ | |||
J_{\rm B}\text{ (v/v)}\\ | |||
E\text{ (v/v)}\\ | E\text{ (v/v)}\\ | ||
U\text{ (v/v)}\\ | U\text{ (v/v)}\\ | ||
\text{Discharge pulp density (}\% \text{ w/w)}\\ | \text{Discharge pulp density (}\% \text{ w/w)}\\ | ||
\ | \rho_{\rm o}\text{ (t/m}^{\text{3}}\text{)}\\ | ||
\ | \rho_{\rm L}\text{ (t/m}^{\text{3}}\text{)}\\ | ||
\ | \rho_{\rm B}\text{ (t/m}^{\text{3}}\text{)}\\ | ||
\end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | \end{bmatrix},\;\;\;\;\;\; | ||
Line 94: | Line 98: | ||
where: | where: | ||
* <math> | * <math>D_{\rm t}</math> is the diameter of the discharge trunnion (m) | ||
* <math>\text{Discharge pulp density}</math> is the mass fraction of solids in the discharge pulp (% w/w) | * <math>\text{Discharge pulp density}</math> is the mass fraction of solids in the discharge pulp (% w/w) | ||
* <math>\ | * <math>\rho_{\rm L}</math> is the density of liquids (t/m<sup>3</sup>) | ||
* <math>\text{Gross power (grate)}</math> is the power the mill would draw if configured with a grate discharge (kW) | * <math>\text{Gross power (grate)}</math> is the power the mill would draw if configured with a grate discharge (kW) | ||
* <math>\text{Gross power (overflow)}</math> is the power the mill would draw if configured with an overflow discharge (kW) | * <math>\text{Gross power (overflow)}</math> is the power the mill would draw if configured with an overflow discharge (kW) |
Latest revision as of 11:13, 4 December 2024
Description
This article describes the Morrell Empirical (Morrell E) method for estimating the power draw of a tumbling mill.[1]
The Morrell E model is a set of empirical equations based on the performance of the theoretical Morrell Continuum model. The model was originally intended to be simpler, and therefore easier to use in practice, than the theoretical Morrell C method.
Model theory
This content is available to registered users. Please log in to view. |
Excel
The Morrell Empirical mill power model may be invoked from the Excel formula bar with the following function call:
=mdMillPower_MorrellE(Parameters as Range)
Invoking the function with no arguments will print Help text associated with the model, including a link to this page.
The Parameters array and model results are defined below in matrix notation, along with an example image showing the selection of the same arrays in the Excel interface:
|
SysCAD
The Morrell Empirical power model is an optional calculation for tumbling mill units. If selected, the input and display parameters below are shown.
See also
References
- ↑ Morrell, S., 1996. Power draw of wet tumbling mills and its relationship to charge dynamics. Pt. 2: an empirical approach to modelling of mill power draw. Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy. Section C. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 105.